Dashboard

Nutrition programme dashboard

An end-to-end dashboard tracking CMAM admissions, cure rates and defaulter trends, built so a programme manager can spot a stockout risk before it disrupts treatment.

4,218
Screenings
12
Communes
10.3%
GAM (MUAC or oedema)
4.1%
SAM

Highest-prevalence communes

Ranked by point estimate. Intervals overlap from one commune to the next; see the figure.
CommuneScreeningsMAG
Anse-Rouge22917.5%
Gros-Morne36116.6%
L-Estere18913.8%
Terre-Neuve24111.2%
Desdunes19711.2%
Ennery26310.3%

Figure

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Anse-Rouge 15.3 Gros-Morne 13.6 L-Estere 12.7 Ennery 8.8 Terre-Neuve 8.7 Marmelade 8.6 Gonaives 7.4 Saint-Michel 7.2 Desdunes 7.1 Saint-Marc 7.1 Verrettes 6.7 Dessalines 5.6 GAM (%)
The three highlighted communes are the only ones whose interval clears the district median.

Why this exists

Audience
Programme manager and nutrition coordinator
The decision it informs
Which sites to reallocate RUTF stock to before the next quarter opens.

How these numbers are produced

Every number on this page is computed from the committed dataset file named below by scripts/export/build-project-dashboards.mjs. Nothing is typed by hand and the page contains no script, no external request and no generation date, so rebuilding it on unchanged data produces an identical file.

Source: muac-screening-artibonite-2024.v1.csv

What this page does not show

The commune ranking is not supported beyond the three highlighted: eleven of eleven adjacent pairs have overlapping intervals. Screening is not a survey, and these rates are not population prevalence estimates.