Dashboard

WASH coverage and water quality by district

A district-level analysis placing every household on the JMP service ladders and testing whether chlorination is actually delivering safe water, so rehabilitation budget goes where the service is worst rather than where the sources look worst.

2,403
Households surveyed
82.3%
Improved source
56.3%
Basic service
improved and within 30 minutes
53.6%
No detectable E. coli
n = 802

By district

The gap between the two columns is households whose source is improved and more than thirty minutes away.
DistrictHouseholdsImproved sourceBasic service
Centre79890.4%70.4%
Nord-Ouest80275.8%49.6%
Sud-Est80380.8%48.8%

Figure

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 Centre — source 90.4 Centre — service 70.4 Nord-Ouest — source 75.8 Nord-Ouest — service 49.6 Sud-Est — source 80.8 Sud-Est — service 48.8 Households (%)
Counting improved sources overstates coverage in every district.

Why this exists

Audience
WASH coordinator and the district water authority
The decision it informs
Which six communities receive water point rehabilitation in the next funding cycle.

How these numbers are produced

Every number on this page is computed from the committed dataset file named below by scripts/export/build-project-dashboards.mjs. Nothing is typed by hand and the page contains no script, no external request and no generation date, so rebuilding it on unchanged data produces an identical file.

Source: wash-household-survey-2024.v1.csv

What this page does not show

Proportions are unweighted and the survey is clustered, so intervals are wider than a sample of this size suggests. The district column is normalised from six spellings.